Journal of Research in Humanities https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal <p><strong><u>Summary</u></strong></p> <p>Journal of Research in Humanities welcomes contributions on critical issues of contemporary and historical significance in the areas of civilization, history, geography, language, literature, philosophy, religion, and related fields in the humanities. Journal of Research in Humanities is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles and book reviews.</p> <p><strong><u>Focus and Scope</u></strong></p> <p>The <em>Journal of Research in Humanities (JRH)</em> is a bi-annual peer-reviewed journal that commenced its journey as a generic publication in the domain of humanities and continues to cater to all sub-disciplines within the field. However, owing to a dearth of literary research journals in Pakistan, the JRH editorial team has decided to dedicate maximum space to scholarly contributions in literary studies. Honoring the tradition of inclusivity, the journal also publishes a designated percentage of articles from the broader humanities and encourages interdisciplinary research. Additionally, JRH would prefer research conducted in a non-Eurocentric manner, particularly studies that approach topics from indigenous and decolonial perspectives.</p> <p><strong><u>Aims and Objectives:</u></strong></p> <p>The aims and objectives of the <em>Journal of Research in Humanities</em> (JRH) are:</p> <ol> <li>To provide a platform for scholars and researchers in the humanities to publish their original and innovative research.</li> <li>To encourage interdisciplinary research in the humanities and promote collaboration among scholars from different sub-disciplines.</li> <li>To promote literary research in Pakistan and provide a space for the publication of high-quality articles in the field of literary studies.</li> <li>To foster critical thinking and intellectual engagement by publishing articles that challenge existing assumptions and offer new perspectives on issues in the humanities by dissemination of research findings and exchange of ideas and information among scholars in the domain of humanities. </li> </ol> <p><strong><u>Ethical Statement: </u></strong></p> <p>The Journal of Research in Humanities is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in all aspects of its operations. As a platform for disseminating scholarly research in the humanities, we are dedicated to fostering a culture of integrity, transparency, and respect for all stakeholders involved in the publication process.</p> <p><strong> Authorship and Originality:</strong></p> <p>Authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Research in Humanities affirm that their work is original and that any sources or ideas from others are appropriately cited. Submitted manuscripts should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere simultaneously. All authors listed in the manuscript have made significant contributions to the research and are in agreement with its submission.</p> <p><strong>Plagiarism and Attribution:</strong></p> <p>Plagiarism in any form is considered a serious breach of academic integrity. Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is free from plagiarism and that proper attribution is given to the sources. The journal employs plagiarism detection tools to identify potential instances of plagiarism.</p> <p><strong>Conflicts of Interest:</strong></p> <p>Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence their objectivity. This includes financial, personal, or institutional relationships that may affect their judgment or decision-making during the publication process.</p> <p><strong> Peer Review Process:</strong></p> <p>The peer review process of the Journal of Research in Humanities is designed to be fair, unbiased, and constructive. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and are expected to provide thoughtful and objective feedback to help authors improve their work. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscripts they review.</p> <p><strong>Editorial Decisions:</strong></p> <p>Editorial decisions are based on the scholarly merit of the submitted manuscripts, their alignment with the journal's scope, and the recommendations of peer reviewers. The editor's decision will be communicated clearly to the authors.</p> <p><strong>Transparency and Corrections:</strong></p> <p>The journal is committed to transparency in its processes. If errors are identified in published works, the journal will promptly publish corrections, clarifications, or retractions as needed. Authors are encouraged to cooperate in addressing any concerns related to published content.</p> <p><strong> Data Integrity and Research Ethics:</strong></p> <p>Authors must adhere to recognized standards of research ethics and data integrity. Research involving human subjects must have received appropriate ethical approval, and any potential risks to participants should be appropriately addressed.</p> <p><strong>Open Access and Licensing:</strong></p> <p>The Journal of Research in Humanities follows open-access principles, aiming to make research freely accessible to the global community. Authors retain the copyright of their work and agree to publish under a Creative Commons license that allows others to share and adapt the work with proper attribution.</p> en-US chief.editor.jrh@pu.edu.pk (Journal of Research in Humanities JRH) chief.editor.jrh@pu.edu.pk (Amna Talat) Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Perilous Journeys to Peaceful Lands in the Quest for a Better Life: Migration Literature as a Space of Negotiation for New Climate Solidarities https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/428 <p>This paper investigates Europe’s most pressing refugee/asylum seeker/immigrant crisis to bridge the knowledge gap between the host nations’ border control, immigration, and integration policies and the human stories of perilous journeys in search of peaceful lands with the help of Nadia Hashmi’s novel When the Moon is Low (2015). The paper explores the ways migration literature can help in overcoming the narrative gap in the recent European refugee/asylum seeker/immigrant management policies. Furthermore, by taking an issue with the European detention centers and their living conditions, the paper highlights the disparity in the myth of equal human rights. The study hopes to open debates around the issue that will decolonize the Eurocentric refugee narrative around immigration and integration policy, place it in a relational and global perspective and suggest a human-rights-oriented frame for reimaging an inclusive migration discourse for the twenty-first century. The paper employs Anibal Quijano’s ‘coloniality of knowledge’ framework to fill the knowledge gap in the Eurocentric immigrant discourse through a literary lens to humanize it and locate alternate epistemologies</p> Syeda Memoona Ali, Syrrina Ahsan Ali Haque Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Humanities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/428 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Dis-Ability: A Trialectics of Material, Imagined and Lived Spatialities in Beckettian Theatre https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/429 <p>Grounded in the broader existential limitation-and-dependency paradigm, dis-ability emerges as both an embodied reality and an extended metaphor in Beckett’s plays, manifested through categorically dis-abled characters. In this study, I employ Edward Soja’s theorisation of space, referred to as the “Trialectics of Spatiality” (Suja 57), as a framework for examining the dialectics of dis-ability and space in Beckettian theatre. By applying Soja’s concepts of first, second, and third space as analytical lenses, this study investigates how Beckett’s characters exist in dis/harmony with the conventional portrayals of dis-ability found in canonical literature. Furthermore, using this heuristic approach as a foundation, the research aims to define the poetics of the Beckettian model of dis-ability intricately woven into the narratives of his plays. The study is limited to a textual analysis of Waiting for Godot (1953), Endgame (1957), and Happy Days (1961) to ensure the analytical soundness of the arguments. From the first-space perspective, I concentrate on the embodied materiality of Beckett’s characters and the physical spaces they inhabit in the selected texts. Through the second space lens, I explore the implications of the characters’ imaginative situatedness as dis-abled beings, focusing on their desires, hopes, and actions as they relate to the plot of the chosen texts. Adopting the third space as a framework, I analyse the Beckettian universe as a liminal and hybrid space where the material and imaginative aspects collaborate to deconstruct the socially constructed binary of normalcy and disability. In doing so, I interpret Beckett’s selected texts as illustrations of the third space, wherein real-life perceptions and their literary representations of normalcy and dis-ability hybridise into an interdependent mode of human existence.</p> Tehmina Yasmeen, Farah Hashmi Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Humanities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/429 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 A Case Study of Nuances of Victimology in Coben’s Fool Me Once: Novel and Adaptation https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/431 <p>This research aims to extrapolate tangents of the process that ascribe meaning to the noun victim and how it transmutes into a verb – understanding victimology as a term through the story of Maya in Harlan Coben’s novel and its television adaptation by employing qualitative analysis as research methodology. It seeks to delineate identity alteration caused by trauma, to discern gender as a parameter in victimization and coping and to trace secondary victimization across minor characters. This study reveals that Coben’s narrative has portrayed the metamorphic cycle of trauma, reflecting its evolution from victimhood into moral insurgency. It is a multidisciplinary initiative in understanding the literariness of modern television adaptations. Deeper nuances of psychological turmoil come to light as the characters of the said corpus build themselves around a typically piquant Coben plot: rich in turbulence, existential dread and a class struggle, Fool Me Once (2016; 2024) is a textured tale of psychic morbidity and its resultant criminal deviance whose merit lies in aligning literary analysis with applied social insight, revealing how crime fiction echoes real world dynamics of victimization.</p> Eman Rehman, Rida Akhtar Ghumman Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Humanities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/431 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 The Endangered Ideals of Democratic Transhumanism in Annalee Newitz’s Autonomous https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/432 <p>Drawing on James Hughes’ postulations on transhumanism in Citizen Cyborg (2004), this paper explores Annalee Newitz’s novel Autonomous (2017) as a blueprint of the endangered ideals of democratic transhumanism. With close reference to the text, the focus is to probe the degradation of autonomy, accessibility, and the fundamental right to free existence for all sentient beings in the 22nd-century hyper-technologized world. It is thus argued that Autonomous uncovers the endangered ideals of democratic transhumanism, such as the fear of exacerbating global inequalities, and the degradation of personhood and autonomy as a consequence of Capitalism. Moreover, this paper suggests a solution-oriented ideology of democratic transhumanism – an ethical approach to using emerging technologies, such as the universal availability of future technological enhancements. Ultimately, it suggests that democratic transhumanist choices are significant for the consequential future, resulting from our present-day decisions for liberation under fair governance rather than enslavement under corporate oppression</p> Aliza Niaz Khan, Faiza Anum Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Humanities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/432 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Rethinking Time in Postcolonial Fiction: A Study of Shehan Karunatilaka’s The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/430 <p>This research examines the nonlinear and spectral representation of time in The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida by Shehan Karunatilaka. The study analyzes how the novel departs from traditional linear models of time by engaging with concepts such as relational time, hetero-temporality, and lived duration. Using an interdisciplinary framework that draws upon physics, historiography, and literary theory, the research demonstrates that the novel portrays time as fragmented, recursive, and ethically significant. It foregrounds that Karunatilaka’s spectral narrative structure reflects a postcolonial condition where memory, trauma, and historical violence are entangled across human and planetary dimensions. The findings suggest that the novel offers a new narrative logic: one that challenges dominant historical paradigms and reimagines temporality as a relational and moral force within postcolonial literature.</p> Zarnab Hassan Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Humanities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/430 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Political Polarization and Societal Struggles in Pakistan: A Dialogic Exploration of Beckett’s Waiting for Godot https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/433 <p>Following qualitative research, the empirical study has engaged educators in an online inter-university dialogue to explore their perceptions of the socio-political realities of the contemporary world, with reference to the play <em>Waiting for Godot</em>. Participants were engaged in dialogue via Google Circles. Using Google Docs in groups, participants liaised digitally about the selected play, which is common across the curricula of public-sector universities across Pakistan. Since the present study engages educators in dialogue exchange, Bakhtin’s theory of Dialogism (1984) has guided this study. The collected data from participants’ written dialogic exchange transcripts via Google Circles was analyzed using the Thematic Analysis model, explicated by Saldana (2015). The key arguments based on the findings demonstrate that participants discussed and connected to the socio-political realities of contemporary Pakistan in the play, where both the literary plot and the real world reflect the state of hopeless waiting, dissatisfaction, and uncertainty. In both, power dominance is shaped by political polarization, socioeconomic inequalities, and systemic flaws. The findings are valuable for curriculum designers, literature instructors, and researchers in dialogic teaching as they provide significant insights into arguments for socio-political turbulent tides and their reflection in the literary world.</p> Tania Shabir Shaikh, Sahar Afshan Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Humanities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/433 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000